Monthly Archives: March 2009

The Metrosexual Superpower

And yet another Mark Steyn gem, this one on the Europeanization of America:

…full-scale Europeanization is already under way: Europeanized health care, Europeanized daycare, Europeanized college education, Europeanized climate-change policy… Obama’s pseudo-SOTU speech was America’s first State of the European Union address, in which the president deftly yoked the language of American exceptionalism to the cause of European statism. Apparently, nothing testifies to the American virtues of self-reliance, entrepreneurial energy and the can-do spirit like joining the vast army of robotic extras droning in unison, “The government needs to do more for me…” For the moment, Washington is offering Euro-sized government with Euro-sized economic intervention, Euro-sized social programs and Euro-sized regulation. But apparently not Euro-sized taxation.

Hmm. Even the Europeans haven’t attempted that trick. But don’t worry, if that pledge not to increase taxes on families earning under $250,000 doesn’t have quite the Continental sophistication you’re looking for in your federal government, I doubt it will be operative very long.

Most Americans don’t yet grasp the scale of the Obama project. The naysayers complain, oh, it’s another Jimmy Carter, or it’s the new New Deal, or it’s LBJ’s Great Society applied to health care… You should be so lucky. Forget these parochial nickel’n’dime comparisons. It’s all those multiplied a gazillionfold and nuclearized – or Europeanized, which is less dramatic but ultimately more lethal. For a distressing number of American liberals, the natural condition of an advanced, progressive western democracy is Scandinavia, and the US has just been taking a wee bit longer to get there. You’ve probably heard academics talking about “the Swedish model”, and carelessly assumed they were referring to the Britt Ekland retrospective on AMC. If only. And, incidentally, fond though I am of Britt, the fact that I can think of no Swedish dolly bird of the last 30 years with which to update that gag is itself a telling part of the problem. Anyway, under the Swedish model, state spending accounts for 54 per cent of GDP. In the US, it’s about 40 per cent. Ten years ago, it was 34 per cent. So we’re trending Stockholmwards. And why stop there? In Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, government spending accounts for between 72 and 78 per cent of the economy, which is about the best a “free” society can hope to attain this side of complete Sovietization. Fortunately for what’s left of America’s private sector, “the Welsh model” doesn’t have quite the same beguiling euphony as “the Swedish model”. But, even so, if Scandinavia really is the natural condition of an advanced democracy, then we’re all doomed. And by “doomed” I’m not merely making the usual overheated rhetorical flourish in an attempt to persuade you to stick through the rather dry statistics in the next paragraph, but rather projecting total societal collapse and global conflagration, and all sooner than you think.

There are two basic objections to the wholesale Europeanization of America. The easy one is the economic argument. The short version of late 20th century history is that Continental Europe entirely missed out on the Eighties boom and its Nineties echo. A couple of weeks back, the evening news shows breathlessly announced that US unemployment had risen to seven per cent, the highest in a decade and a half. Yet the worst American unemployment rate is still better than the best French unemployment rate for that same period. Indeed, for much of the 1990s the EU as a whole averaged an unemployment rate twice that of the US and got used to double-digit unemployment as a routine and semi-permanent feature of life. Germany, the economic powerhouse of Europe in the Sixties and Seventies, is now a country whose annual growth rate has averaged 1.1 per cent since the mid-Nineties; where every indicator – home ownership, new car registrations – is heading down; and in which government agencies have to budget for such novel expenditures as narrowing the sewer lines in economically moribund, fast depopulating municipalities because the existing pipes are too wide to, ah, expedite the reduced flow. Even flushing yourself down the toilet of history is trickier than it looks.

Of course, if you’re one of the seemingly endless supply of Americans willing to turn up at the president’s ersatz “town meetings” to petition the seigneur to take care of your medical bills and your mortgage and the gas in your tank, the Euro-deal looks pretty sweet. When they deign to work, even the French can match the Americans in hourly productivity. Unfortunately for boring things like GDP, the Euro-week has far fewer hours. There are government-mandated maximum 35-hour work weeks, six weeks of paid vacation, more public holidays, and, in the event that, after all that, some unfortunate clerical error still shows the calendar with an occasional five-day week, you can always strike. The upshot is that, while a working American puts in an average 1,800 hours a year, a working German puts in 1,350 hours a year – or 25 per cent less.

It’s tempting to assume these are deeply ingrained cultural differences. “It’s The Good Life, full of fun, seems to be the ideal,” as the Gallic crooner Sacha Distel smoothly observed. But, in fact, until the Seventies Americans and Europeans put in more or less identical work hours. What happened is that the Protobamas of the Continental political class legislated sloth, and, as is the way, the citizenry got used to it. Indeed, the proposed European Constitution enshrines leisure as a constitutional right. Article II-31: “Every worker has the right to limitation of maximum working hours, to daily and weekly rest periods and to an annual period of paid holiday.” There’s no First Amendment or Second Amendment, but who needs free speech or guns when life is one gentle swing in the government hammock?

When American commentators notice these numbers, it’s usually to crank out a why-oh-why-can’t-we-be-as-enlightened? op-ed. A couple of years back Paul Krugman wrote a column asserting that, while parochial American conservatives drone on about “family values”, the Europeans live it, enacting policies that are more “family friendly”. On the Continent, claims the professor, “government regulations actually allow people to make a desirable tradeoff – to modestly lower income in return for more time with friends and family.”

As befits a distinguished economist, Professor Krugman failed to notice, that for a continent of “family friendly” policies, Europe is remarkably short of families. While America’s fertility rate is more or less at replacement level – 2.1 – seventeen European nations are at what demographers call “lowest-low” fertility – 1.3 or less – a rate from which no society in human history has ever recovered. Germans, Spaniards, Italians and Greek have upside-down family trees: four grandparents have two children and one grandchild. The numbers are grim, and getting grimmer. The EU began the century with four workers for every retiree. By 2050, Germany will have 1.1 workers for every retiree. At Oktoberfest a decade or three hence, that fetching young lad in the lederhosen serving you your foaming stein will be singlehandedly propping up entire old folks’ homes. Except he won’t. He’ll have scrammed and headed off to Australia in search of a livelier youth scene, or at any rate a livelier late-middle-aged scene. And the guy taking his place in the beer garden won’t be wearing lederhosen because he’ll be Muslim and they don’t like to expose their knees. And, come to think of it, he’s unlikely to be serving beer, either. The EU would need at least another 50 million immigrants – working immigrants, that is (they’re not always, especially with Euro-welfare) – to keep wrinkly old Gerhard and Jean-Claude in the social programs to which they’ve become accustomed.

To run the numbers is to render them absurd: It’s not about economic performance, public pensions liabilities, entitlement reform. Something more profound is at work. Europe has entered a long dark Oktoberfest of the soul, drinking to oblivion in the autumn of the year, as les feuilles mortes pile up all around.

Let’s take the second part of Paul Krugman’s assertion: These “family-friendly” policies certainly give you “more time”. For what? High-school soccer and 4-H at the county fair? No. As we’ve seen, kids not called Mohammed are thin on the ground. God? No. When you worship the state-as-church, you don’t need to bother showing up to Mass anymore. Civic volunteerism? No. All but extinct on the Continent. So what do Europeans do with all that time? Do they paint, write, make movies? Not so’s you’d notice. Not compared to 40 years ago. Never mind Bach or even Offenbach, these days the French can’t produce a Sacha Distel or the Germans a Bert Kaempfert, the boffo Teuton bandleader who somewhat improbably managed to play a critical role in the careers of the three biggest Anglophone pop acts of the 20th century – he wrote “Strangers In The Night” for Sinatra, “Wooden Heart” for Elvis, and produced the Beatles’ first recording session. If that sounds like a “Trivial Pursuit” answer, it’s not. Eutopia turned out to be the trivial pursuit; to produce a Bert Kaempfert figure right now would be a major accomplishment Europe can’t quite muster the energy for. “Give people plenty and security, and they will fall into spiritual torpor,” wrote Charles Murray in In Our Hands. “When life becomes an extended picnic, with nothing of importance to do, ideas of greatness become an irritant. Such is the nature of the Europe syndrome.”

The key word here is “give”. When the state “gives” you plenty – when it takes care of your health, takes cares of your kids, takes care of your elderly parents, takes care of every primary responsibility of adulthood – it’s not surprising that the citizenry cease to function as adults: Life becomes a kind of extended adolescence – literally so for those Germans who’ve mastered the knack of staying in education till they’re 34 and taking early retirement at 42 (which sounds a lot like where Obama’s college-for-all plans will lead).

Genteel decline can be very agreeable – initially: You still have terrific restaurants, beautiful buildings, a great opera house. And once the pressure’s off it’s nice to linger at the sidewalk table, have a second café au lait and a pain au chocolat, and watch the world go by. At the Munich Security Conference in February, President Sarkozy demanded of his fellow Continentals, “Does Europe want peace, or do we want to be left in peace?” To pose the question is to answer it. Alas, it only works for a generation or two, and then, as the gay bar owners are discovering in a fast Islamifying Amsterdam, reality reasserts itself.

In 2003, the IMF conducted a study of Eurosclerosis and examined the impact on chronic unemployment and other woes if the Eurozone labor market were to be Americanized – that’s to say, increase participation in the work force, reduce taxes and job-for-life security, etc. The changes would be tough, but over the long-term beneficial. But it’s too late for that: What’s “changed” is the disposition of the people: If it’s unsustainable, who cares? As long as they can sustain it till I’m dead. That’s the second and most critical objection to Europeanization: It corrodes self-reliance very quickly, to the point where even basic survival instincts can be bred out of society in a generation or two. In America Alone, I cited a headline that seemed almost too perfect a summation of a Continent where entitlement addiction trumps demographic reality: “Frenchman Lived With Dead Mother To Keep Pension.” She was 94 when she croaked, so she’d presumably been getting the government check for a good three decades, but hey it’s 700 euros a month. He kept her corpse under a pile of newspapers in the living room for five years, and put on a woman’s voice whenever the benefits office called. Since my book came out, readers send me similar stories on a regular basis: “An Austrian woman lived with the mummified remains of her aunt for a year, Vienna police said Wednesday.” In Europe, nothing is certain except death and welfare, and why let the former get in the way of the latter?

It’s interesting that it never occurred to the IMF that anyone would be loopy enough to try their study the other way around – to examine the impact on America of Europeanization. For that, we had to wait for the election of Barack Obama. Which brings us to the third problem of Europeanization: What are the consequences for the world if the hyperpower embarks on the same form of assisted suicide as the rest of the west? In quite the wackiest essay Foreign Policy has ever published, Parag Khanna of the Brookings Institution argued that the European Union was now “the world’s first metrosexual superpower”. And he meant it as a compliment. Mr Khanna’s thesis is that, unlike the insecure American cowboy, Europe is secure enough in its hard power to know when to deploy a little sweet-smelling soft power. Seriously:

“The EU has become more effective—and more attractive—than the United States on the catwalk of diplomatic clout… Metrosexuals always know how to dress for the occasion (or mission)… but it’s best done by donning Armani pinstripes rather than U.S. Army fatigues… Even Turkey is freshening up with eau d’Europe… Stripping off stale national sovereignty (that’s so last century), Europeans now parade their ‘pooled power,’ the new look for this geopolitical season…

“Brand Europe is taking over… Europe’s flashy new symbol of power, the Airbus 380, will soon strut on runways all over Asia…But don’t be deceived by the metrosexual superpower’s pleatless pants—Europe hasn’t lost touch with its hard assets…Europe’s 60,000-troop Rapid Reaction Force will soon be ready to deploy around the world… Just as metrosexuals are redefining masculinity, Europe is redefining old notions of power and influence. Expect Bend It Like Brussels to play soon in capital cities worldwide.”

And on and on, like one of those pieces an editor runs when he wants to get fired and go to Tuscany to write a novel. The Airbus 380 is a classic stillborn Eurostatist money pit, the Rapid Reaction Force can’t deploy anywhere beyond a Europe Day parade down the Champs Elysee, and given that the governing Socialist caucus on the Brussels city council already has a Muslim majority I doubt they’ll be bending it themselves that much longer. This is the logical reductio of the Robert Kagan thesis that Americans are from Mars, Europeans are from Venus. It’s truer to say that Europeans are from Pluto, which was recently downgraded to “dwarf planet” status. A dwarf superpower doesn’t have policies, it has attitudes – in part, because that’s all it can afford. An America that attempts Euro-scale social programs would have to reel in its military expenditures. After all, Europe could only introduce socialized health care and all the rest because the despised cowboy across the ocean was picking up the tab for the continent’s defense. So for America to follow the EU down the same social path would have huge strategic implications for everyone else, not least Europe. We would be joining the Continentals in prancing around in Armani pinstripes and eau d’Europe as the bottom dropped out of our hard assets. And Putin, Kim Jong-il, the mullahs et al might not find the perfume as heady as Mr Khanna does.

Even in its heyday – the Sixties and Seventies – the good times in Europe were underwritten by the American security guarantee: The only reason why France could get away with being France, Belgium with being Belgium, Sweden with being Sweden is because America was America. Kagan’s thesis – Americans are from Mars, Europeans are from Venus – will look like paradise lost when the last conventional “great power” of western civilization embraces the death-cult narcissism of its transatlantic confreres in the full knowledge of where that leads. Why would you do anything so crazy? Ah, but these are crazy times: Europeans are from Pluto, Americans are from Goofy.

See, Hear, and Certainly Speak No Evil

Thomas Sowell examines the dangers of having a “rookie president” about whom no one is permitted to speak evil:

…Barack Obama is a rookie in a sense that few other Presidents in American history have ever been. It is not just that he has never been President before. He has never had any position of major executive responsibility in any kind of organization where he was personally responsible for the outcome.

Other first-term Presidents have been governors, generals, cabinet members or others in positions of personal responsibility. A few have been senators, like Barack Obama, but usually for longer than Obama, and had not spent half their few years in the senate running for President.

What is even worse than making mistakes is having sycophants telling you that you are doing fine when you are not. In addition to all the usual hangers-on and supplicants for government favors that every President has, Barack Obama has a media that will see no evil, hear no evil and certainly speak no evil.

They will cheer him on, no matter what he does, short of first-degree murder– and they would make excuses for that. Even former Reagan speech writer Peggy Noonan has gushed over President Obama and even crusty Bill O’Reilly has been impressed by Obama’s demeanor.

There is no sign that President Obama has impressed the Russians, the Iranians or the North Koreans, except by his rookie mistakes– and that is a dangerous way to impress dangerous people.

What did his televised overture to the Iranians accomplish, except to reassure them that he was not going to do a damn thing to stop them from getting a nuclear bomb? It is a mistake that can go ringing down the corridors of history.

Future generations who live in the shadow of that nuclear threat may wonder what we were thinking about, putting our lives– and theirs– in the hands of a rookie because we liked his style and symbolism?

In the name of “change,” Barack Obama is following policies so old that this generation has never heard of them– certainly not in most of our educational institutions, where history has been replaced by “social studies” or other politically correct courses.

Seeking deals with our adversaries, behind the backs of our allies? France did that at Munich back in 1938. They threw Czechoslovakia to the wolves and, less than two years later, Hitler gobbled up France anyway.

This year, President Obama’s attempt to make a backdoor deal with the Russians, behind the backs of the NATO countries, was not only rejected but made public by the Russians– a sign of contempt and a warning to our allies not to put too much trust in the United States.

Barack Obama is following a long practice among those on the left of being hard on our allies and soft on our enemies. One of our few allies in the Middle East, the Shah of Iran, was a whipping boy for many in the American media, who vented their indignation at his regime– which now, in retrospect, seems almost benign compared to the hate-filled fanatics and international terrorism sponsors who now rule that country.

However much Barack Obama has proclaimed his support for Israel, his first phone call as President of the United States was to Hamas, to whom he has given hundreds of millions of dollars, which can buy a lot of rockets to fire into Israel.

Our oldest and staunchest ally, Britain, has been downgraded by President Obama’s visibly less impressive reception of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, compared to the way that previous Presidents over the past two generations have received British Prime Ministers. President Obama’s sending the bust of Winston Churchill in the White House back to the British embassy at about the same time was either a rookie mistake or another snub.

We can lose some very big games with this rookie.

If Not America, Who?

Another Mark Steyn gem. A brief excerpt:

…The United States…is the first non-imperial superpower. At the dawn of the American moment in 1945, it chose to project itself not in traditional great-power ways but by creating the UN and other transnational institutions in which it consciously diminished its own voice and artificially inflated everybody else’s. Over time, all these American-created, American-funded transnational institutions became explicitly anti-American, to the point where it seems entirely routine for the representative of a genocidal regime in Sudan to be elected to the UN “human rights” council and announce from his plush Manhattan office that he wants to make Guantanamo Bay the main focus of his term.

America garrisons not distant ramshackle colonies but its wealthiest allies – Germany and Japan – to the point where almost every other western nation now budgets for an ever more minimal, perfunctory military, entirely confident that US defense welfare is a permanent feature of life. Troops from India, the dominions and the colonies provided a third of Britain’s military manpower in the First World War, and half in the Second. By comparison, America heads a military alliance of non-military allies in which it expends vast amounts of diplomatic energy trying to persuade the world’s richest countries to cough up a token detachment of non-combat troops to man the photocopier back at barracks while the Third Infantry Division slogs up into the mountains to do all the fighting.

And, while one can admire the antipathy to empire, harder to explain is the reluctance of America to export its founding ideas. Dozens of new nations have come into being since 1945, a lot of them with the aid of American blood or treasure, and yet not one was encouraged to adopt a US model of government. If England is the mother of parliaments, America is a wealthy spinster with no urge to start dating.

I’m not indulging in the misplaced anglophilia to which American conservatives are sometimes prone. Contemporary Britain is an unlovely place sinking into a hell of Hogarthian depravity from which there are no easy roads back: Consider what LBJ’s Great Society did to the black family, and then imagine it applied to the general population. The Britannic inheritance will last longer in India and Australia than in the mother country.

But I do worry about whether America’s disinclination to sell the world its own best ideas has led to some of the world’s very worst ideas coming home to roost. Individual freedom is on the skids everywhere. Britons and Canadians fought tyranny abroad only to enter the 21st century enthusiastically embracing incrementally the control-freak caprices and micro-regulatory regimes of their old enemies. The world could use a bold standard-bearer for liberty. If not America, who?

http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18344 arsir dOerUps
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8012 r iadmAxh
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13787 aaqMxOnredru
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9027 unaoCye
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15943 gr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9083 eeO zrdidarrC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=267 tnerevSe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12058 Persha incyr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14725 iN
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=119 seoCr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8796 h
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=114 gopeCs
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18183 ccai
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7620 Apearlhleag
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=392 uv LteyaBr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=90 pa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10406 ai
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8747 xif BraheaC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=355 Gu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11981 ohCHadiaepo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16629 eiAnrR
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=6521 sc hosteaWunrPa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7907 vAde arrrO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8348 ev maeanAOrtrd
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11176 uermvshaPF
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=271 tSoho
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9335 hC r
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17273 peCaah kliS
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18582 iotueBynVl
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=247 xnoor
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16391 u
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9286 taCeCnshhipoa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10588 fsi
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=233 nlilPde
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17014 fmrBe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15047 raPytrohOx
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=317 oaai grSVtf
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16034 eiyr o
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=2821 yelnrBipt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5220 lDcfar haeuPnci
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8110 pwagesnCaAahda
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=67 mAoil
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9314 ihh
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5241 orxf
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5688 iiuosrhetcrpLP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4485 i t
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7858 AsduebneO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=275 ot
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=358 n
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=424 eien emtpr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15894 reaPdardioOr rc
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=174 fleotK
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15264 heaepiC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=417 il
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=345 torMeBao n
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=98 Bert
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13108 tLrep aoivhd
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=3525 Bgaaiy
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14032
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17504 Sr au
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10343 eocrDhr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=217 Nr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17889 SeaamPc rru
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5192 achCuie
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=123 yectCo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15509 e
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17021 am fdSerraOr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9713 ru
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11092 rx
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15061 o
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=6626 t
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10266
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=76 lxm
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18526 hsaaniaP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14970 a
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13584 u ea
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17 ctvorea
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=421 mneC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=21 Ee
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=229 tnei
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14375 -eeecy
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12163 erIB ty
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8404 aiCeaA
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5657 oiOpL dtrr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18099 rTretadred
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4999 Condyie
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8208 aa taAe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15600 r deOarlhcoar
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=101 a
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12303 smchueIasPr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8201 rO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11834 ocC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9419 tliBuC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7760 drmO loexriA
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=181 a
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17609 xareidOrS r
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10441 aie
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9657 oPcuCsupgrha ee
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=38 Onyn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=6619 cZs aute
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5276 hpdne
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14515 unyrouBniN
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18239 ryip
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=270 kl
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=450 siCe dxeehAta
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10854 aaeCmhps
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12814 aa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14039 Mat Ciehxlep
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15838 liiuiB
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=19023 Zetyriu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4520 iByBuina
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12800 muraBi
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13199 sOr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4569 uBtilronyB
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4957 oOarpCe zamlnde
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15684 seoPsdPnuh earinre
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4861 e dereCxbOrlr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10000 htaermuycaalP b
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10903 eCedE ap
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12030 eirpn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10896 Edn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=37 ov
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=264 yRaamalu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=71 alcnAdoe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7991 asreuPeiccrtph
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=1786 rLtpiuy
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=364 aSlueaeexml
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7809 rAOedadinrs
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5431 elaepCl
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12177 xIhre
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15257 entPidrrrmneO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=161 aiampHsl
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14025 e y
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7109 breucahAaP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9034 npreoOae tCrd
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11470 reas lFotenP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=189 i
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=241 vrPiil
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8838 BerirOder
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16860 PalihecsrRpuda
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13976 ovMuy Bc
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18435 ainV
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=256 qRpei
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18820 creePXonceha uars
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18869 aluneafeZPxa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8726 rBicnuaenaosP n
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13647 Lzoao
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10735 sxcDPihsae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11575 eo ndBoG
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18204 xCapT
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11001 cpEa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13822 nhrMaxaae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10007 ysBenyto u
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12961 erC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13059 e
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16783 taenRhomni pab
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13878 Myu tn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12905 naruaOse dL
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4762 aleCeBx
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9755 r
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13136 o itesocrPaLhrevuhd
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8152 t
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10014 ytso
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=225 loPmae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=295 siaalodVn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9853 hce
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=356 o
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7361 AcBincti y
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=36 Ncr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=310 tcWe iy’snInmo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15152 u aBil
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14508 ecNssaprPur
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16909 uo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7473 aAtapa ed
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16433 e
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11911 HsraiPshczmau
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=362 rehPeiltab ernenm
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14 oC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16615 sRacr uPehuiqe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=81 idAxem
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4 be
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18337 is
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=2678 Byu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18393 GerV dOe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18925
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=246 rrc
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10350 aDn cyBboie
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12513 KreeOr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17210 lSo Brey
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7963 CAeeihc
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10259 srer leyedOrD
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13052 v
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7501 tra
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12261 om y
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=266 nS
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8922 e
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9328 Orer
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12170 rmt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7074 beaOA
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8439 yB
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=425 lahaC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13675 au lo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18092 anrBedTtu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=554 yiB
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8775 asfuxer
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=87 gt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=265 Smafae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10882 acrsaP uhEmsm
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12 ail
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16881 lCRhr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4681 lba apC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=334 oyt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11372 acax
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9972 a
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10651 oa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9475 di dlorerCOm
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10448 yeraxBuD
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=207 icM
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=126 akeepotD
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17665 hteSi
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17266 edh
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=354
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5234 fOxro
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=132 noeidr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12996 uein
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8845 CatBh i
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=278 NrtiSclet
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9678 o Ce
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12548 bKrcfe
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14802 oP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17322 hetpS aCh
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14480 oa pryn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=57 iZxaro
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10021 hCa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13689 r oelkudO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18631 mV
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=86 tvtAer
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18190 yu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16832 Cs
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14067 cMie ahr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14410 xMerPscleeuG
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=244 oruPmri
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8243 uAetry
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8054 trd
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=100 AC
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16979 RaaahmeC yu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=230 ixP el
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8642 Obtn
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5515 Bn yeooouyr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=250 uimPr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=78 stuA
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11925 rpdrHaOliae mis
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=420 thrlmCae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12415 rmae
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8502 dArpa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7795 hulcamAxo Psr
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=190 p
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15292 ui nthcrsrimeheenaP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=4769 eCerelaO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16664 s
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10798 ii dO
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10700 d eo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=18498 aad
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=55 xo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7508 ucyt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5325 ButsnF
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11127 lsrceP
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=91 va
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=30 i
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=152 sFa
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=7403 tcPcra eucsi
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14333 boepaMCay
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10315 p DeerCl
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5751 tre
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14074 ciclBnuM i
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=15159 arri
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=16048 PCeo ri
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17462 roenSfodr Or
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12646 hyeKr s
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10294 aehcur
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12849 xa i
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=419 Lip
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=13731 yaLunlr oB
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=203 Mro
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=10658 a
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11197 eae FhdepClne
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14417 yeo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=17693 SeltushhrictrNeca
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=5709 aaCp meohzaeL
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=185 ood
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14809 oiu
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12401 IdsP real
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=8432 iPa vunAshcardea
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14655 oat PeoupcimN
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=11246 ramaFhpea
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=14627 hteNipCm
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=6773 Bo
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=146 nleeF
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=12324 osnphiapIt
http://www.survivalrecords.org/goodie/?p=9867 sr eCroedrtO

The New Enemy Combatants

Mark Steyn is OUTRAGED!!:

…To his credit, the hopeychanger-in-chief has had some difficulty doing the outrage kabuki with a straight face. In the middle of his press conference the other day, he got a tickle in his throat and departed from his telepromptered script to joke: “Excuse me, I’m choked up with anger here.” How the assembled hacks laughed! Why, it was almost as funny as his gag on “The Tonight Show.” Referring to his 129 score at the White House bowling alley, the president cracked that “it was like the Special Olympics.” Ha-ha! What a card that Obama is when he unplugs the prompter and kicks loose a little. Maybe next time he can toss in that the Dow Jones has got “Down” syndrome – geddit? Oh, come on! Don’t be so uptight and politically correct!!! And besides, anyone who says the president shouldn’t be doing crip jokes is a racist.

Frank James of the Chicago Tribune criticized the president’s bon mot more in sorrow than in anger: “Obama seems to be a fairly sensitive and compassionate man who wouldn’t purposely set out to offend the disabled.”

Are you sure about that? He might be “a fairly sensitive and compassionate man.” Alternatively, he could be a mean, self-absorbed S.O.B. who regards anyone other than himself as intellectually disabled. The truth is we don’t know, because in the course of the presidential campaign the press declined to do even the most elementary due diligence on him. And, like Congress with the stimulus, the electorate didn’t bother to find out what’s in there before they voted for it.

Still, on the basis of its first 60 days, this is a very odd presidency. In between appearances on Jay Leno and his “March Madness” picks, Barack Oprompta also found time to compare AIG executives to suicide bombers:

“Even though it makes you angry because you’re thinking I was responsible, and these folks are irresponsible, and somehow I’m paying for them, it was the right thing to do to step in. The same is true with AIG. It was the right thing to do to step in. Here is the problem. It’s almost like they’ve got, they’ve got a bomb strapped to them, and they’ve got their hand on the trigger. You don’t want them to blow up, but you’ve got to kind of talk them, ease that finger off the trigger.”

Right. It’s like you’re at the Jay Leno post-show party and suddenly you notice this AIG vice-president has wandered in, with six figures of bonus strapped to his waist, and he’s yelling “Allahu akbar!,” which is Arabic for “I’d like to deposit this in my Cayman Islands account.”

Maybe Obama’s teleprompter had a wild night on the tiles and inserted his terrorism speech into the middle of his bonus outrage. But, if not, we now know why the White House announced that they’ll no longer be using the term “enemy combatants” for the Gitmo crowd. They’re reserving that designation for AIG execs, most of whom will shortly be extraordinary-renditioned to Saudi Arabia where a touch of the old electric cattle-prods should soon have their bowling scores heading south.

Any sentient being dumb enough to fall for this AIG huffin’ an’ a-puffin’ from Barry, Barney, Doddy and the gang is a fool who deserves the vaporization of his assets that the national political class is lining up for him. As Charles Krauthammer pointed out, the $165 million in bonuses is less than 1/18,500th of the $3.1 trillion budget. The massive expansion of government the president is planning is forever, and will ensure you that end your days in what Peggy Noonan calls “post-prosperity America.” More immediately, what message do you send to the world when legal contracts can be abrogated by retrospective confiscatory bills of attainder? You think that’s going to get anyone investing in America again?

The investor class invests in jurisdictions where the rules are clear and stable. Right now, Washington is telling the planet: In our America, there are no rules. Got a legally binding contract? We’ll tear it up. Refuse to surrender the dough? We’ll pass a law targeted at you, yes, you, Mr. Beau Nuss, of 27 Plutocrat Gardens, Fatcatville. If you want a banana republic on steroids, this is great news. So cheer on thuggish grandstanding by incompetent legislators-for-life like Barney Frank if you wish. But, in any battle between the political class and the business class, you’re only fooling yourself if you think it’s in your interest for the latter to lose.

The first two months of the Age of the Hopeychange have been an eye-opener. I expected it to be ideologically distasteful to me, but I didn’t expect it to be so inept. Not because I had any expectations of President Obama’s executive skills. But I assumed he’d have folks around him who could take care of details like governing, while he pranced around as the smiley-face hopeychange frontman. But the bench is still empty save for a handful of mediocrities. And the disconnect between the smoothly scripted mush and what’s actually happening makes the telepromptered cool look even more ridiculous.

And John Hawkins on Barry’s amateur 60 Minutes performance.http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=164 ryazH
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15642 eodyriu BPnsn
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=171 gmKar
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14725 a N
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14718 rorOezarl
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13486 stneu LnoyB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15103 lP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=126 etea
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4292 caorve c
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10847 a
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=129 Doecnb
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=361 HlM arxeb
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14088 pc haMaaC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10406 Dar oidfkOre
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=1786 ytpBLiui
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11085 Bnox elyEu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15635 aPvarsh cehP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13920 hae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15110 rlPlor
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7571 pAe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6 xain
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=56 ooZrc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7956 trecpdreiOr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7620 pralAgeh
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18883 ecdrrtZO
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9 bi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=292 Uarpsis
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9517 o
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=229 in
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=118 o
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10 C
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=135 oDa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=169 spiIt
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14522 dee
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11666 orearPh uscretei
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7221 dO
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12163 rm
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=316 rly aalVg
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=176 cm
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12359 iBrsloId
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=35 ueNm
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=183 Lv
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6780 coero
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12016 tyiyuHr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15313 epxihC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=422 egCaihr Vpa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=115 ornCreo
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11372 raac umePlhx
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18197 Tri
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9664 e
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=103 Crdma
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9223 lxn
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15880 irhre
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12170 reit
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7459 B
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15362 nhaCal
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10833 cEPe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7109 n baeAauPcrs
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14711 uyNzrl
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=287 tendTa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=73 alAlgre
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=193 te
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=199 xiua
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=156 arleH
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5055 Orer
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10399 Bkify
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=288 orcrTi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11981 aheCpoda
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5417 B xe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=715 mreeOtrenre
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8257 a
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13087 Lv aerePusc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10595 B nuyin
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7851 BnateyA subu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10651 n vr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2701 Peectarheu anTu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15019 haOtl
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12716 hCa le
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14865 d
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16041 eOoa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8873 eru
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13969 hs texnraue
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9825 CaoCahr z
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10742 vlElB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=48 xnaaX
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15831 eoisrerc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4583 lC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7319 olem
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5645 re
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=284 r
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15348 aB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=357 Gae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11379 ou
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6626 uaeB tyZi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=92 AmSlury
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=64 auAc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9706 ronePu asCh
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11862 euh orsia
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9559 rabtcovPCmneh
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10588 eierachif rPDn
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=276 nmeS
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=309 etirWg
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16573 Rupe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15985 ur moiemyutPr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=119 rsCore
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13010 nave
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15691 eyBaP mi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13724 eucLr Pl
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=228 en leosP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15852 ipiCv
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13283 aisihcsrPrpo lnu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9608 chae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12863 eChsaixLp a
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12310 ytp
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15600 ervr olar
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13626 suehnxicP taoar
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=89 vdniaAa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11827 erldiciOrHo m
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=435 eiAxO dred
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=251 h
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14515 tiyu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9412 cnar
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18330 i su
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7452 shuccoserP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16664 ucPReAanserh-
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=58 aZbyn
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=198 nlya
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=3176 UnB laty
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10693 ysnieDx Bo
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2065 PinignuBemeytnhe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2 pdAxi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9034 rerdnC eaO
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17658 rNlO teihrtc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13241 psiBonLlii yu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11715 leu xcarHoa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=120 oolyrCkp
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=125 loset
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9727 eaohCg
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8880 B syupu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12408 mu rKayaB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=355 Gtwanorm Hh
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4722 er
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17154 e ersPSe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14067 Phcesi ltx
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17553 S
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8887 seurrB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7753 BAlmiu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12989 asP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12940 eaus
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5702 paez rOra
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=419 pae CethLvari
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14480 nN physaopra
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18547 hCaVat
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2755 st
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=280 nlpS
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11519 aosm hsPcxrae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18792 raepe XnCa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18232 sTrPucaemirohx
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5006 Oirod
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=420 hlCpmaU ea
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5529 pa dncyoC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9566 onoudyfBCi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=365 Vea
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12758 xrdniOLne
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14473
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10217 ptCaeeae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18428 lcVa-rsGPu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4776 hCleC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=275 tbSraioe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9867 odrO
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=157 L
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=188 liLosipri
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18449 aein
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13 eble
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=32 tLroab
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7060 vsc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=388 r
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7172 eercAcrant
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6934 oheCam
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=95 inBsnno
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10441 aDfPksiouhreac
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2939 irhHrdce
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13885
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16671 a
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8341 edmayt u
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10882 meEac hs
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7 iorBt
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=434 ner
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18785 eoeernrdOa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=2833 OT
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13934 nOea
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9853 aroP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=47 nciV
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5234 frfdexrEOer
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5800 aOriMi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15355 Prr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16482 RlnaOd
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8971 uAcL
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5377 edc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18540 eeOd
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17889 u
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=389 SB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=1743 erarhveita
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8012 eCxAhmidpri ae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=395 Br yV
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7270 r Oehpri
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14753 Polesic uNzraa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18498 iaCanapdeVho
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14431 asyeeMpChon
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=139 sEm
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5185 i
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7165 euayA
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11134 u vy
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13045 ye
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18925 bBueeZay
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15488 P
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=222 nOecim
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12352 tu iescpIrnshaoP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13234 uohcPisasa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10896 rnredOdpEe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17616 eSCilhpra
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=106 eenhCap
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8306 np
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11729 g e
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6836 eva oZpaCi
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=16097 rCer
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7949 uA
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5171 aied
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10637 i
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=85 txar
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=215 illiecontN
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10455 OreDredrax
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6885 ayp
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10658 haCveniDap
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14676 rho eahCNpdis
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14179 MicroOd
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17546 rroer
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18988 lehoe rmnCZ
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13731 naryo lLB
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7522 dhaecot pnAleaC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8782 B miBrh
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=317 iorVa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11183 eBl
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12506 KatbyeuBf
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=245 pcParo
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14963 Oatree
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=68 cinA
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14816 NrOloxrdi n
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18099 rrT rdt
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7746 AayrmPlrs
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9965 e aObtmd
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6584 s ZlrOrie
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=51 ce
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4520 Bu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11778 e dcri
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=289 io
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=206 siadircM
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=184 eeLn
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11876 io
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=75 rAmyla
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15166 i
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=6038 cuOyoxny Bit
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7816 AneiChdpa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10294 aerec s
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10364 bace
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14116 erc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17217 rre uqloeOer
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18624 nnPohsertaVe cliu
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7963 c rpteheia
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5508 GruheuopPc chlaa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=12107 yusaehHarP
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7501 hlasae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5480 hhp
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=18890 nhCteaapc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17210 ol
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7662 re AOtldcae
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=8978 n
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5940 NyBrc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=259 hRtoco
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17665 pCrhl S
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=617 h
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13871 hnPaernueas
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=15159 xalr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=17511 tOra
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=223 tchaO
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=44 dzneo
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=5807 eidp ieMrah
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11680 bdxoe raHlOe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10007 noe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=302 Zaa
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11295 hm Fr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14669 oerrdsN idhOr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=11673 bBe
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9524 Oe drCobenvmrt
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=13451 aLproCh xo
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=10063 dr cytOr
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=9482 aldhepimC
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=7760 Or
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=14410 acxGusMeehc
http://uwsccmi.org/menu/?p=4485 iCavtah

Ron Silver

Ann Coulter on the late Ron Silver:

I wish I could ask Ron Silver what he thinks of the AIG bonuses. He’d have some original take — maybe propose re-opening the bonuses paid to Franklin Raines and Jamie Gorelick for their yeoman’s work running Fannie Mae into the ground and then collecting bonuses of $90 million and $24.7 million, respectively. Or maybe he’d just make a joke.

But I can’t ask him anymore because Ron died of a rare esophageal cancer last Sunday.

So now there is one less person in the world who never chooses his positions to feed a pompous ego or to stroke his self-image as a thinking person. There was no point to posturing for Ron: His social standing in Hollywood was revoked the moment he supported Bush and the Iraq War.

Perhaps Ron always spoke his mind, but I didn’t know him when he was “brave”; I only knew Ron when he was actually brave.

I’ve noticed that words like “brave” and “courageous” are mostly used nowadays to mean “left-wing..” We’re constantly asked to admire the monumental courage of Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Sean Penn, Janeane Garofalo and the Dixie Chicks — sometimes even by other people.

But for my younger readers, what courage traditionally meant was risking the disapprobation of people you know. It was about losing friends, losing work and losing status where you live — not alienating people you will never meet. Insulting people in Kansas when you live in Los Angeles is not speaking truth to power; it’s speaking anything to serve power.

One thing you cannot say about Ron’s magnificent speech at the 2004 Republican National Convention is that he did it to go with the flow in Hollywood, to take the path of least resistance, to win easy applause. Ron did lose work, lose friends and lose his entire social apparatus…

…After an aborted operation on his cancer in July 2007, as soon as I saw Ron in his hospital bed, I told him I had Christians across the country praying for him. He said, “That’s good, because the Jews are praying for me to die.”

What Would Sarah Have Done?

Noemie Emery wonders what Sarah would have done:

Now that the Obama presidency is nearing the 60-day mark, it’s time to thank those fastidious scribes on the left and the right who worked so hard to warn us against Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska, and the dire things that would surely occur if she ever got close to executive power. How right they were to insist that she was unfit for high office. Let’s just imagine what she might have done:

As president, she might have caused the stock market to plunge over 2,000 points in the six weeks after she assumed office, left important posts in the Treasury unfilled for two months, been described by insiders as ‘overwhelmed’ by the office, and then gone on to diss the British Prime Minister on his first state visit, giving him, as one head of state to another, a set of DVDs plucked from the aisles of Wal Mart, a tasteful gift, even if they can’t be played on a TV in Britain. (Note, the Prime Minister, who is losing his eyesight, may even be blind in one eye).

As vice president, she might have told Katie Couric that when the stock market crashed in 1929, President Franklin D. Roosevelt went on TV to reassure a terrified nation. Or on her first trip abroad as Secretary of State, she might have, as the AP reported, “raised eyebrows on her first visit to Europe…when she mispronounced her “EU counterparts names and claimed U.S. democracy was older than Europe’s,” then gave the Russian minister a gag “reset” button, on which the word “reset” was translated incorrectly.

What a good thing that Palin, whom Christopher Buckley called “an embarrassment, and a dangerous one,” wasn’t in office to cause such debacles, and that we have Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton instead.

“This is not a leader, this is a follower,” wrote ex-Reagan muse Peggy Noonan. “She follows what she imagines is the base, which is in fact a vast and broken-hearted thing whose pain she cannot, actually, imagine…she doesn’t seem to understand the implications of her own thoughts.”

Huh? While indulging in prose such as this, the Palinphobes didn’t seem to understand the implications of Palin’s record as governor, which they appear to never have looked at, while obsessing over her life in Alaska (too rural), her children (too many), and her exploits as a huntress (too much).

This is the flip side of their refusal to be disturbed by the fact that Obama had no record to speak of, as long as he looked like a Gap or Vogue model, and could write and could talk up a storm. A Gap or Vogue model would never disgrace you, and besides, he was there.

“You’re camping, and you wake up one morning and there is a mountain,” as David Brooks put it. “The next morning, there is a mountain…Obama is just the mountain. He is just there.” Braced by rationales such as this, the literati flocked to Obama, while denouncing Palin as appealing to the party’s least logical members and wing.

Call the Palinphobes lacking in logic and they will have tantrums, but this time the sandal might fit. This is the Audacity of Type, a faith-based illusion if ever there was one, the belief that qualities shared by and appealing to pundits and writers – glibness, a worldly patina, and a superficial verbal facility – are those needed to run a great nation in a troubled and dangerous era…

No Room At The European Inn For Gitmo Torture Victims

According to an article in today’s New York Times, our European friends, after years of moral preening during the Bush administration, are now having second thoughts about Guantanamo and the innocent shepherds unjustly detained therein:

European countries that have offered to help the Obama administration close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, have begun raising questions about the security risks and requirements if they accept prisoners described by the Bush administration as “the worst of the worst,” according to diplomats and other officials.

The concerns, and a deep suspicion of whether the American intelligence community will share full information on the prisoners, are likely to complicate the resettlement effort, which is critical to President Obama’s fulfilling his pledge to close Guantánamo within a year of his taking office.

The offers, from Spain, Portugal, Italy, France, Belgium, Switzerland and other countries, have been widely seen as efforts to win favor with the new administration by helping to close the camp, which was a contentious issue during the Bush years.

Still, with a first round of talks on the Guantánamo issues scheduled for Monday in Washington between Obama administration officials and a high-level delegation from the European Union, several European leaders have recently emphasized that they can make no firm commitments until they are given complete details on the prisoners.

“We’d have to study concrete cases,” María Teresa Fernández de la Vega Sanz, Spain’s deputy prime minister, said in an interview last week.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton recently told reporters she was “quite encouraged at the positive, receptive responses we’ve been getting” to requests for help in accepting Guantánamo detainees.

But some European officials said the Obama administration had yet to detail what would be involved in resettling detainees and whether the United States would also open its doors to Guantánamo prisoners, which the Bush administration declined to do.

It is not clear exactly what conditions the Obama administration may wish to impose, what the detainees’ immigration status would be or whether any detainees released to Europe would be eligible for complete freedom. “We understand, you have a big problem,” said one European official who said he would speak only if not identified. “And we appreciate what President Obama has said about closing Guantánamo. But that doesn’t automatically mean putting all the remaining inmates on a plane and sending them to Europe.”…

It's The Jews, Stupid!

A Washington Post editorial unloads on Chas Freeman, Obama’s ex-nominee for chairman of the National Intelligence Council, and his and his supporters’ blame-the-Jews campaign:

Former ambassador Charles W. Freeman Jr. looked like a poor choice to chair the Obama administration’s National Intelligence Council. A former envoy to Saudi Arabia and China, he suffered from an extreme case of clientitis on both accounts. In addition to chiding Beijing for not crushing the Tiananmen Square democracy protests sooner and offering sycophantic paeans to Saudi King “Abdullah the Great,” Mr. Freeman headed a Saudi-funded Middle East advocacy group in Washington and served on the advisory board of a state-owned Chinese oil company. It was only reasonable to ask — as numerous members of Congress had begun to do — whether such an actor was the right person to oversee the preparation of National Intelligence Estimates.

It wasn’t until Mr. Freeman withdrew from consideration for the job, however, that it became clear just how bad a selection Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair had made. Mr. Freeman issued a two-page screed on Tuesday in which he described himself as the victim of a shadowy and sinister “Lobby” whose “tactics plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency” and which is “intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government.” Yes, Mr. Freeman was referring to Americans who support Israel — and his statement was a grotesque libel…

…What’s striking about the charges by Mr. Freeman and like-minded conspiracy theorists is their blatant disregard for such established facts. Mr. Freeman darkly claims that “it is not permitted for anyone in the United States” to describe Israel’s nefarious influence. But several of his allies have made themselves famous (and advanced their careers) by making such charges — and no doubt Mr. Freeman himself will now win plenty of admiring attention. Crackpot tirades such as his have always had an eager audience here and around the world. The real question is why an administration that says it aims to depoliticize U.S. intelligence estimates would have chosen such a man to oversee them.

And look who’s purveying the Jewish conspiracy line: The New York Times and the pro-Obama gay activist and unhinged anti-Sarah Palin fanatic Andrew Sullivan

A Growing Army of Straw Men

Jennifer Rubin on out-of-touch Barry:

…the president flicks away the real world news, while his supporters point to poll numbers. That’s right — we have 8.1% unemployment and a stock market crash; they take refuge in a popularity poll more than three and half years before the president would again face the voters. (To its credit the Bush team never boasted about polls numbers or showed much concern when their fortunes changed.) And in their spare time they devise a juvenile plot to attack a radio talk show host.

Rather than ruminating on the worsening economy, Obama is cheered by polls and fixated on redesigning America. The cratering economy doesn’t give him pause. Instead it encourages him to speed up before the voters catch up with him…

…Defenders of the president dismiss the notion that Obama’s policies and rhetoric are in any way responsible for our current plight. It happened on Bush’s watch! Of course it did. But they misstate their opponents’ criticism — another straw man in a growing army of them. The question is not whether Obama caused the recession, but whether he is making it worse. Even the AP spots the fallacy of the Obama administration’s defense: “Although the administration likes to say it ‘inherited’ the recession and trillion-dollar deficits, the economic wreckage has worsened on Obama’s still-young watch.” And it is simply folly to deny that the devastation of wealth in the stock market has made things worse and further unnerved Americans. The stock market crash is the greatest anti-stimulus development of his presidency. Obviously, consumers and homeowners feel even less financially secure than they did when the Dow was 3,000 points higher…

…Perhaps if the Treasury Department was fully staffed or if Paul Volker was not apparently banished to an undisclosed location, the president might have a better grip on why his anti-business, anti-wealth-creating policies and rhetoric have sent the markets skidding. Maybe if the national press were less invested in his New Deal II vision, he would confront daily criticisms and aggressive questioning about his schemes. And if he spent more time talking to agitated wealth creators, investors, retirees, and middle-class parents and less time at photo-ops and campaign-style rallies with handpicked fans, he might internalize what it means to lose half or more of your retirement or college fund.

But on he strides, into the Brave New World of a government-directed economy. (Incidentally, if Tim Geithner is not the best advertisement for limited government I don’t know what is.) And the scariest part of the first six weeks of this administration? The realization that, contrary to his defensive remark in his joint address to Congress, he really doesn’t “get it.”

Obama to World: I'm Just Not That Into You

Mark Steyn on Europe’s increasingly troubled love affair with Barry:

…I would make a modest prediction that in 2012, after four years of the man who was supposed to heal America’s relations with a world sick of all that swaggering cowboy unilateralism, those relations will be much worse. From Canada to India, the implications of the Obama ascendancy are becoming painfully clear. The other week Der Spiegel ran a piece called “Why Obamania Isn’t the Answer,” which might more usefully have been published before the Obamessiah held his big Berlin rally. Written by some bigshot with the German Council on Foreign Relations and illustrated by the old four-color hopey-changey posters all scratched up and worn out, the essay conceded that Europe had embraced Obama as a “European American.” Very true. The president is the most European American ever to sit in the Oval Office. And, because of that, he doesn’t need any actual European Europeans getting in the way — just as, at his big victory-night rally in Chicago, the first megastar president didn’t need any megastar megastars from Hollywood clogging up the joint: Movie stars who wanted to fly in were told by his minders that he didn’t want any other celebrities deflecting attention from him. Same with world leaders. If it’s any consolation to Gordon Brown, he’s just not that into any of you.

What Mr. Brown and the rest of the world want is for America, the engine of the global economy, to pull the rest of them out of the quicksand — which isn’t unreasonable. Even though a big chunk of the subprime/securitization/credit-bubble axis originated in the United States and got exported round the planet, the reality is that almost every one of America’s trading partners will wind up getting far harder hit.

And that was before Obama made clear that for him the economy takes a very distant back seat to the massive expansion of government for which it provides cover. That’s why he’s indifferent to the plummeting Dow. The president has made a strategic calculation that, to advance his plans for socialized health care, “green energy,” and a big-government state, it’s to his advantage for things to get worse. And, if things go from bad to worse in America, overseas they’ll go from worse to total societal collapse. We’ve already seen changes of government in Iceland and Latvia, rioting in Greece and Bulgaria. The great destabilization is starting on the fringes of Europe and working its way to the Continent’s center.

We’re seeing not just the first contraction in the global economy since 1945, but also the first crisis of globalization. This was the system America and the other leading economies encouraged everybody else to grab a piece of. But whatever piece you grabbed — exports in Taiwan, services in Ireland, construction in Spain, oligarchic industrial-scale kleptomania in Russia — it’s all crumbling. Ireland and Italy are nation-state versions of Bank of America and General Motors. In Eastern Europe, the countries way out on the end of the globalization chain can’t take a lot of heat without widespread unrest. And the fellows who’ll be picking up the tab are the Western European banks who loaned them all the money. Gordon Brown was hoping for a little more than: “I feel your pain. And have you ever seen The Wizard of Oz? [One of the DVDs Barry gave Brown as a gift]. It’s about this sweet little nobody who gets to pay a brief visit to the glittering Emerald City before being swept back to the reassuring familiarity of the poor thing’s broken-down windswept economically devastated monochrome dustbowl. You’ll love it!”…

Writing in the Daily Telegraph of London, Janet Daley agrees:

…Mr Obama – who gives the impression of being considerably out of his depth in the economic maelstrom – talks of an “opportunity” to “reorganise our priorities”. He gave a major speech last week in which he actually seemed to suggest that the present crisis had been caused by America’s failure to develop a universal health care system and to attend to the impending environmental disaster of global warming (“we made the wrong choices”), and that by focusing on these matters a way can be found out of the country’s economic problems.

Is he quite mad? Does he really believe that the banking crisis and the recession were some kind of divine retribution for the absence of universal health care, and excessive carbon emissions? Or is he suggesting that a practical solution lies in spending money on health care and the development of alternative energy sources?

If it is the latter, then he is making a pitch for old-fashioned Roosevelt-style government-expenditure programmes which take money out of the productive part of the economy and bring state intervention into play in new dimensions of national life. It did not work for Roosevelt and it will not work now.

But maybe sentimental mythology matters more than historical reality: what Obama and Brown are both trying to do is to put themselves on the benevolent, morally attractive side of the argument by saying: we – your government – will act, intervene, take positive steps to help you. We will not stand by and let the hurricane winds of the economy blow you down. (Mr Brown has actually used the word “hurricane” to describe the crisis, as if it were a natural disaster which no one could have prevented.)

What neither the Prime Minister nor the President can admit is what is becoming more obvious every day (and which has been admitted by the Prime Minister of New Zealand, John Key): there is precious little that any politician can do to resolve the present economic problems. The values of assets and property are simply going to have to fall from the grossly inflated points they reached under the debt bubble to what are generally accepted to be realistic levels. Then people will start to do business again – as eventually they must – and confidence will gradually return.

So are these politicians pretending that they have answers out of wilful deceit – out of the need to keep playing the game for partisan advantage? Or are they simply attempting to maintain some degree of public optimism about the future? (After all, an “opportunity” sounds better than a “debacle”.)

Well, I grew up with the Left and what this looks like to me is a power grab: a seizing of the moment by the forces which always believed in state domination. The Left sees an opening here, first for telling a critical lie about the historical origins of this crisis, which was propelled as much by the Left-liberal determination to spread prosperity through easy credit to the poor, as by the greed of bankers. And then, out of the wreckage, to restructure the economy along the lines that it always wanted, complete with central controls over the pay levels in private financial institutions.

We are being led to believe that public debate should be all about economic mechanics when it should really be about political principle: just how many freedoms do we want to lose while governments pretend that they are the solution?