Monthly Archives: September 2006

Intellectually Anorexic

Melanie Phillips on the British Labor Party’s continuing appeasement of Islamists by implicitly denying the existence of Israel.

Click here.

Far More Insidious

Victor Davis Hanson on the new anti-semitism:

We’re accustomed to associating hatred of Jews with the ridiculed Neanderthal Right of those in sheets and jackboots. But this new venom, at least in its Western form, is mostly a leftwing, and often an academic, enterprise. It’s also far more insidious, given the left’s moral pretensions and its influence in the prestigious media and universities. We see the unfortunate results in frequent anti-Israeli demonstrations on campuses that conflate Israel with Nazis, while the media have published fraudulent pictures and slanted events in southern Lebanon.

Keepin' It Real

Mark Steyn on Juan Williams’s new book and black “authenticity.”

An excerpt:

The concept of “authenticity” — that one’s skin colour mandates particular behaviours, such as voting Democrat and supporting “affirmative action” — is, of course, racist. But the peculiar touchiness of the black community on this question recurs again and again in Williams’s book. “The defence of gangster rap, with its pride in guns and murder, was that it was all about ‘keepin’ it real,’ ” he writes. “In that stunning perversion of black culture, anyone who spoke against the self-destructive core of gangster rap was put down as acting white.”

This is a fascinating theme whose significance extends far beyond music — or, in this case, “music.” We’re encouraged these days to disdain ethnic stereotypes — the Scots are stingy, the Germans humourless, etc. — but, if one were to ascribe certain characteristics to particular ethnic groups, you’d be hard put to burden African-Americans with as many disabling pathologies as are currently touted under the justification of “keepin’ it real.” “Violence, murder, and self-hatred were marketed as true blackness — authentic black identity,” says Williams. “Keepin’ it real” means the rapper Nelly making a video in which he swipes a credit card through his ho’s butt. “Keepin’ it real” means men are violent and nihilistic, women are “sluts, bobbing chicken heads, and of course bitches.” “Keepin’ it real,” noted the writer Nick Crowe, equates, in effect, to “disempowerment.” Because if being black means being a self-destructive self-gratifying criminal rutting machine, and building a career, settling down, getting a nice house in the suburbs, raising a family is acting white, that would seem to hand whitey an awful lot of advantages.

How To Commit National Suicide

Melanie Phillips on the “mega mosque” that will dominate London’s Olympic village in 6 years time.

Resenting America's Virtues

British writer Roger Scruton takes a look at Hugo Chavez’s hero, Noam Chomsky.

I particularly like this:

…it is his ability to excite not just contempt for American foreign policy but a lively sense that it is guided by some kind of criminal conspiracy that provides the motive for Prof. Chomsky’s unceasing diatribes and the explanation of his influence. The world is full of people who wish to think ill of America. And most of them would like to be Americans. The Middle East seethes with such people, and Prof. Chomsky appeals directly to their envious emotions, as well as to the resentments of leaders like President Chavez who cannot abide the sight of a freedom that they haven’t the faintest idea how to produce or the least real desire to emulate.

Success breeds resentment, and resentment that has no safety valve becomes a desire to destroy. The proof of that was offered on 9/11 and by just about every utterance that has emerged from the Islamists since. But Americans don’t want to believe it. They trust others to take the kind of pleasure in American success that they, in turn, take in the success of others. But this pleasure in others’ success, which is the great virtue of America, is not to be witnessed in those who denounce her. They hate America not for her faults, but for her virtues, which cast a humiliating light on those who cannot adapt to the modern world or take advantage of its achievements.

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Krauthammer postulates his law on who’s Jewish.

The Vacant Vessel

Donald Kagan writes about Harvard in Commentary:

Does it matter that Harvard’s curriculum is a vacant vessel? It is no secret, after all, that to the Harvard faculty, undergraduate education is at best of secondary interest. What is laughingly called the Core Curriculum—precisely what [former president Larry] Summers sought to repair—is distinguished by the absence of any core of studies generally required. In practice, moreover, a significant number of the courses in Harvard College are taught by graduate students, not as assistants to professors but in full control of the content. Although they are called “tutors,” evoking an image of learned Oxbridge dons passing on their wisdom one-on-one, what they are is a collection of inexperienced leaders of discussion or pseudo-discussion groups. The overwhelming majority of these young men and women, to whom is entrusted a good chunk of a typical undergraduate’s education, will never be considered good enough to belong to Harvard’s regular faculty.

This is what parents go into debt for.

You can read the entire article here.

The Twelfth Imam For Secretary General

Mr. Steyn on the unhinged UN.

An excerpt:

Iran’s president was a huge hit at the U.N. Short of bringing out some burqa-clad Rockettes and doing a couple of choruses of “This Is the Dawning of the Age of a Scary Us,” he couldn’t have been a bigger smash. I said a year or two back, apropos the U.N., that it’s a good basic axiom that if you take a quart of ice cream and blend it with a quart of dog poop the result will taste more like the latter than the former. And last week’s performances at the General Assembly were a fine illustration of that. Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez were the star finalists of “UnAmerican Idol,” and, just when you need Simon Cowell, the only Brit in sight was the oleaginous Mark Malloch Brown, Kofi Annan’s deputy, fawning over every crazy in town. The rest of the bigwigs reacted like Paula Abdul, able to discern good points even in fellows who boast about not having any.

Move It To Venezuela

Hugo’s one good idea.

Kofi Bush

Good piece by Anne Bayefsky on the wacky UN.

And she doesn’t spare Bush:

The real surprise of the day, however, was President George W. Bush. Last year at this time the president issued a list of reforms he expected from the U.N. in the near future: a new human-rights body which didn’t count abusers among its members, a comprehensive treaty against terrorism, meaningful institutional reforms in the area of oversight, accountability, efficiency. Not one of those demands has been met, but instead of issuing a failing grade, the president said nothing at all about U.N. reform. On Iran, the most he could muster was “Iran must abandon its nuclear-weapons ambitions.” No talk of sanctions. No mention of consequences for Iran’s obvious refusal to abandon those ambitions. On Hamas he said “the world is waiting to see whether the Hamas government will…pursue an extremist agenda.” Waiting to see? Just how many rocket attacks, kidnappings, speeches inciting racial hatred and violence, or murders does it take be an extremist? And on the Palestinian-Israeli front he said “the Palestinian people have suffered from…the daily humiliation of occupation” — the exact language of…yes, Kofi Annan.